DEJ Posts #6

Posted on

A Framework for Ethical Decision Making

Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University “A Framework for Ethical Decision Making” is a guide on how to deeper understand ethical decision making. The six lenses give a unique way of framing how to look at ethical issues. The lens helps determine what standards of behavior and character traits can be considered right and good but leaves room for flexibility depending on the specific situation. They are black-and-white rules that allow for gray answers. I think that using the lenses in hand with the steps of the framework for ethical decision-making helps make these difficult decisions simpler. Often when dealing with ethical dilemmas or trying to decipher the specific dilemmas in a case study it is unclear what is right and wrong. Having lens-specific questions makes this process easier. I found the virtue lens specifically interesting. It is associated with the question, “Which option leads me to act as the sort of person I want to be?” I admire how malleable this question is. It can be applied to almost any ethical situation and is extremely personal. No two people are going to have the same answer to this question. Some virtues are trust, honesty, courage, compassion, responsibility, optimism, generosity, tolerance, love, and passion. Virtues are personal and challenge us to be better people by forcing us to reflect and set standards for ourselves. It is the foundation of how you choose to live your life and act towards others. The same ethical decision is going to challenge different virtues in different people. Virtues are part of what makes studying ethical dilemmas so interesting because they are the cause of conflict between people’s ethical priorities.

DEJ Posts #5

Posted on

Mini Analysis 2 Blog Analysis – Whistleblower Lawyer Blog

For the Mini Analysis 2 Blog Analysis, I studied a blog post by Whistleblower Lawyer Blog that detailed a whistleblowing case related to alleged financial falsifications in the Mormon church. I found the case fascinating. The blog post linked to a Wall Street Journal article and a 60 Minutes CBS news report. I was able to watch the 60 Minutes segment on Paramount+. It was very interesting to get to see the manager who blew the whistle on the case and to hear him tell the story. It is interesting to see how David Nielsen had ethical dilemmas in many facets of the case. He was open and honest and explained the ramifications of stepping forward and exposing the Church. He was conflicted between his personal relationship with the church and seeing the wrong that the church’s financial firm was doing. A bishop from the church was also interviewed in the 60 Minutes segment. Hearing his side of the story adds another layer to the case. The interviewer remained extremely neutral and provided information from both sides of the story while trying to clarify details that the Bishop was unclear about. Nielsen also explained to 60 Minutes that he was shunned and shamed for coming forward. This was very similar to the other blog post I read for the mini analysis where another whistleblower shared similar feelings after coming forward. It is very interesting to see that this is a common occurrence when people come forward. Overall I found this blog post to be a launching point that inspired me to find out more while considering ethical frameworks continuously.

Mini Analysis 2 Blog Analysis – Whistleblower Lawyer Blog
https://www.finchmccranie.com/whistleblower-blog/

Video Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mormon-church-ensign-peak-whistleblower-david-nielsen-allegations-60-minutes-2023-05-14/