For my module #6 Dual Journal Entry post #12 I decided to do my reaction reflection discussing the “Academy of Management” article in module #6’s readings by Thomas M. Jones.

text to self: After reading this paper about Jones’ model I really focused on the concept of moral intensity throughout the reading. As it brought to mind how individuals usually react much much differently to ethical dilemmas in their own lives. This theory resonates in everyday situations where personal motivation to act ethically might be swayed to not depending on an individuals perception of the situation. Everyone goes through these situations on a day to day basis, for example every time I drive and get screwed over by someone else’s driving capabilities haha.

text to text: This article reminds me of multiple other readings we have had over these past few modules as Jones’ approach builds on existing models that we have previously learned about the last couple of weeks. He emphasizes the nature of the issue itself, which is a fact that a lot of previous models we have learned about typically tend to ignore. For example Rest’s model focuses on recognizing moral issues and acting on moral intent but does not address how different situations may affect the level of ethical concern that is brought to a situation and or a persons actions.

text to world: Jones’ model has broad implications on organizational ethics and societal structures as a whole seen globally today. It brings focus on issues like corporate responsibility, environmental impact, and the ethical actions of businesses and leaders. His emphasis on moral intensity underlines why companies need to establish structures that increase the importance of ethical considerations seen globally today. For example applying Jones’ model to college admissions highlights how moral intensity factors (such as social consensus on fairness and proximity to the affected students) could shape decision-making processes for administrators, potentially driving more equitable policies.