I discovered from the text that tackling moral difficulties calls for deep analysis of ethical norms and principles in addition to fact-finding. The five methods of ethical problem-solving that are highlighted in the work are virtue ethics, rights, justice, utilitarianism, and the common good. By framing moral quandaries in various ways, each strategy aids in helping us arrive at more morally sound conclusions. For instance, the rights approach stresses upholding people’s liberties and dignity, whereas the utilitarian approach concentrates on maximizing benefit and reducing damage. In addition to helping us navigate challenging circumstances, these frameworks promote introspection about how we interact with others and whether our behavior is consistent with the ideals of our community. What really stood out to me was how well the various ethical perspectives worked together. For example, the common-good approach pushes us to look beyond our own interests and prioritize the welfare of the community as a whole. According to the text, “Appeals to the common good urge us to view ourselves as members of the same community, reflecting on broad questions concerning the kind of society we want to become and how we are to achieve that society.,” when we hear appeals to the common good. This quotation strikes a chord with me because it emphasizes the value of group accountability in moral decision-making and challenges us to think about how our actions affect everyone, not just ourselves.

Source: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/thinking-ethically/